WebP vs JPG vs PNG – which is better? (2026 comparison)
If you build websites, you’ve probably asked: should I use JPG, PNG, or the newer WebP? Each has strengths and weaknesses. This guide compares them head‑to‑head on file size, image quality, transparency, and browser support – so you can make the right choice for your project.
1. Format basics
- JPG (or JPEG): Lossy compression, best for photographs. No transparency. Small file size with adjustable quality.
- PNG: Lossless compression, supports transparency. Ideal for screenshots, logos, graphics with sharp edges. Larger files.
- WebP: Modern format by Google. Supports both lossy and lossless, transparency (alpha channel), and animation. Can replace both JPG and PNG in many cases.
2. Compression & file size comparison
We tested a sample photo (1920×1080) and a screenshot with text & icons. Results (approximate):
| Format | Photo (quality ~85) | Screenshot (lossless) |
|---|---|---|
| JPG | 500 KB (baseline) | – (not suitable) |
| PNG | – | 800 KB (baseline) |
| WebP lossy | 300‑350 KB (30‑40% smaller) | – |
| WebP lossless | – | 550‑600 KB (25‑30% smaller) |
WebP consistently beats both JPG and PNG in file size for comparable visual quality.
3. Quality & transparency
- JPG: Can show blocking artifacts at low bitrates. No transparency.
- PNG: Perfect quality, supports full transparency (8‑bit alpha). Large files.
- WebP: Lossy mode can be tuned to be visually lossless; lossless mode preserves every pixel. Supports transparency with similar efficiency to PNG.
4. Browser support (2026)
- JPG/PNG: Universal – supported by every browser since the 1990s.
- WebP: Supported in all modern browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera. Global usage >97%.
WebP is safe to use for the vast majority of visitors. You can provide JPG/PNG fallbacks for legacy browsers using the <picture> element.
5. When to use each format
- Photographs on your website: Use WebP (lossy) with a JPG fallback. You’ll save 30‑40% bandwidth.
- Screenshots, UI elements, logos: Use WebP (lossless) – it’s smaller than PNG while keeping crisp edges.
- If you need to edit images frequently: Keep a master copy in PNG or PSD; export to WebP for web.
- When you must support Internet Explorer: Serve JPG/PNG to those users via
<picture>.
6. Step‑by‑step: convert to WebP with DocUpLift
All tools run 100% in your browser – no uploads, total privacy.
- Open WebP Converter.
- Drag & drop a JPG or PNG image (or multiple).
- Adjust quality slider – for lossy, 80‑85 is usually great; for lossless, choose “lossless” mode.
- Click “Convert” – the WebP file is generated instantly in your browser.
- Download and use on your website.
7. Pros and cons summary
JPG
✅ Great for photos, universally supported. ❌ No transparency, artifacts at low quality.
PNG
✅ Lossless, transparency, sharp. ❌ Large file sizes.
WebP
✅ Smaller than both JPG and PNG, supports transparency and animation, good browser support. ❌ Slightly more complex to encode (but tools handle it).
8. Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to switch to WebP?
Try our WebP Converter – it’s private, no upload, and free. You can also combine with Image Compressor to fine‑tune quality.
🖼️ Convert to WebP – 100% private
Drag & drop JPG or PNG, choose quality, and download a modern WebP image. No upload, no signup.
Try WebP ConverterRemember: choosing the right format can cut your page weight in half. WebP is the winner for most use cases, but keep those JPG/PNG fallbacks handy for complete compatibility.